Do elections really need to be controversial?

It is true, national elections create a time and place for discussion. Conversations between friends and neighbors take place regarding such questions as ‘what does he/she stand for?? ‘how will that person or ballot issue impact me?? or ‘how should I vote??
Until last week, I was overwhelmingly impressed by our local media for covering the school election with facts and information. I was proud of the fact that our newspapers were giving residents the information they needed in order to make an informed decision. Furthermore, I was pleased that they were simply encouraging everyone to cast a vote. I never once thought that one of our newspapers would actually ask people to voice only concern or dislike for the upcoming school ballot proposals. Why do some media folks believe that elections should be a cause for division?
In my opinion, this school election will bring the mission and vision of the schools to the forefront. Hearty discussions should be taking place on the best way to serve our children. I don’t expect everyone to be in favor of our plan; and those that disagree have an opportunity to cast a vote. As long as every resident is armed with facts and information, I will be satisfied.
With that said, I feel it is my duty to take every opportunity given to me to describe and clarify the June 9th election. I do not feel that this school election, or any other election, should be hampered by a journalist’s attempt to sensationalize or create a story. Asking for citizens to respond in any predetermined way (positive or negative) is simply wrong and poor journalism. So allow me to calmly answer a few commonly asked questions regarding our bond proposal, non-homestead millage renewal and the Board of Education election.
Q. Why don’t we put an addition on to Clarkston High School?
A. By adding on to Clarkston High School, we would then have a 3000-student high school. As educators, we believe that high schools of that size are more difficult to manage and offer fewer opportunities for students to feel connected. Furthermore, if we add on to Clarkston High School now, it would be very difficult for our community to ever have two high schools of balanced enrollment in the future. We simply don’t know what the future will hold, and we feel it is best to keep more options open.
Q. Does the bond proposal ask for a tax rate increase?
A. No. The district is not asking for residents to increase the current 7 mill debt rate. Instead, the district is asking for residents to extend the current rate for six additional years. Residents are currently paying 7 mills on debt through the year 2023. If the bond proposal is approved, residents would pay 7 mills on debt through the year 2029.
Q. How does the Non-homestead millage renewal impact school district funding?
A. The 4.5 non-homestead millage renewal ensures that the school district collects full funding from the State of Michigan. Under the law, the State assumes that school districts collect 18 mills on all business, industry and second homes. When the non-homestead millage falls below this limit, the district loses a portion of per pupil funding. In Clarkston, this would mean a loss of approximately $1.6 million dollars in next year’s budget.
Q. Why are there so many candidates running for the school board?
A. Our school district is fortunate to have so many involved and caring individuals supporting us every day. Being a school board member is one of the most demanding ways to support and enhance the school district. We have eight candidates who all see the importance of this role and they are all willing to work for the betterment of kids.
While the bond proposal is the largest item, all three ballot issues are essential to the future of our quality school system. If you have any question, or need further clarification, please do not hesitate to call us at 623-5420. I am hopeful that no matter what your position is, you will let the facts dictate your decision. We can be divided on the best way to handle our growth and future needs, as long as we are unified on the importance of quality schools and the students we serve. Please remember to vote on Monday, June 9.

Comments are closed.